Samsung has indeed secured a significant legal win in its ongoing patent dispute with Chinese telecommunications company ZTE. A UK High Court ruling on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, granted Samsung an interim license to use ZTE's mobile phone patents.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of this decision:
* Interim License Granted: This is the core of the ruling. The court has allowed Samsung to continue selling mobile phones that utilize ZTE's disputed patented technology without having to wait for a final court judgment on the fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms of the patent license. This ensures business continuity for Samsung.
* First of Its Kind at Trial Level: The ruling is particularly notable because it's the first time an English court of first instance (trial court) has formally granted such an interim patent license declaration in a telecoms patent dispute. While similar short-term licenses have been allowed in previous cases (like Amazon vs. Nokia and Lenovo vs. Ericsson), those were typically resolved before trial or at a higher court level.
* FRAND Dispute: The case revolves around the determination of FRAND terms for licensing standard-essential patents (SEPs). SEPs are patents that cover technology essential to implementing a particular industry standard (e.g., mobile communication standards like 5G). Companies that own SEPs are generally obligated to license them to others on FRAND terms to prevent abuse of their dominant position.
* Global Legal Battle: This UK ruling is just one part of a wider, global patent dispute between Samsung and ZTE. Samsung initially sued ZTE in London in December 2024, seeking a determination of FRAND terms. ZTE, in turn, filed parallel lawsuits against Samsung in China (Chongqing and Hangzhou), Germany, Brazil, and at the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
* ZTE Accused of Bad Faith: A crucial element of the UK judge's decision was his finding that ZTE had "acted in bad faith" by launching a "wave of unnecessary injunctive proceedings" in various jurisdictions. Judge James Mellor stated that ZTE's proposed terms for an interim license were designed to make the UK action "pointless" and force Samsung to accept the outcome of the Chinese court case. He noted that a "willing licensor" would not engage in such tactics.
* Implications: This ruling is a significant win for Samsung as it can continue its operations uninterrupted. It also sends a message that English courts are prepared to assert their authority in setting FRAND terms in global patent disputes, even when parallel actions are active elsewhere. This could influence how other international patent disputes involving SEPs are handled.
Neither Samsung nor ZTE has made a public statement regarding the court's decision so far. The case is still ongoing, and the court has not yet decided the final FRAND terms.
0 Comments