Yes, Microsoft is currently facing a new lawsuit filed by a group of prominent authors who allege that the tech giant used their copyrighted books without permission to train one of its artificial intelligence models.
Here's a summary of the key details:
* Plaintiffs: The lawsuit was filed by a group of high-profile authors, including Pulitzer Prize winner Kai Bird, Jia Tolentino, and Daniel Okrent, among others.
* Allegation: The core accusation is that Microsoft used nearly 200,000 pirated digital books to train its "Megatron" AI model. The authors claim this was done without their consent and constitutes large-scale copyright infringement.
* Purpose of AI Training: The lawsuit alleges that Microsoft used this vast dataset of unlicensed literary material to develop an AI system capable of generating text that "mimics the syntax, voice, and themes of the copyrighted works on which it was trained."
* Legal Action: The complaint was lodged in a New York federal court. The authors are seeking:
* Statutory damages of up to $150,000 for each allegedly misused work.
* A court order to block Microsoft from further alleged infringement.
* Context: This lawsuit is part of a growing wave of legal challenges facing major tech firms (including Meta, Anthropic, and OpenAI) over how they acquire and use data to train their generative AI systems. These cases raise fundamental questions about copyright law in the age of AI and what constitutes "fair use" of copyrighted material for training purposes.
* Microsoft's Response: As of the latest reports, Microsoft has not publicly responded to these specific allegations in the lawsuit.
* Timing: This lawsuit comes shortly after a federal judge in San Francisco dismissed a similar copyright lawsuit against Meta (as discussed previously), though that dismissal was largely based on the plaintiffs' failure to show specific market harm rather than a ruling on the legality of AI training itself. Another recent ruling against Anthropic also found that while training might be fair use, using pirated books in a "central library" was not.
This lawsuit against Microsoft adds another significant case to the ongoing legal battles that will likely shape the future of AI development and intellectual property rights.
0 Comments